Kinds of questions used during meeting for collecting information. Part 2

Into the article that is previous we’ve currently talked in regards to the purpose and forms of topic and management questions. Now, let’s check out the others of concerns classification.

Intent behind behavioral kinds of questions

Behavioral questions in turn provide to govern the interlocutor, provoking actions that are certain their component. Such questions are employed in interview-confrontation. The journalist’s goal in this full instance is not to get the information, but to make the interviewee away write papers pay from himself, to be able to present it to your readers as unbalanced, dishonest and stupid. It ought to be borne at heart that whenever making use of such concerns a journalist will not only ruin relations with the character of this meeting, not the way that is best to appear within the eyes of readers when they get the journalist’s tricks dishonest. Behavioral questions are split into:

  • suggestive,
  • questions-traps,
  • hinting,
  • amplifying,
  • provoking.

The question that is suggestive one answer better than others, for instance: «All honest people do that. And can you? «Or:» usually do not you imagine that anyone who votes against our prospect will not would like a stable growth of the nation?» The interlocutor is offered either to concur with a few declaration which he will not think is right, or even to declare himself dishonest or otherwise not as with any other folks.

The trap question is a concern through the category: «Have you already stopped consuming?» — any reply to that will never be in support of the interlocutor, that he is either drinking now or was drinking earlier since he must admit. Inspite of the knowledge that is common of trick, reporters continue to actively put it to use.

Hinting, amplifying and questions that are provoking

The true purpose of the question is at first hidden with a hinting question. The interlocutor is inquired about a particular well-known fact, after which, beginning with this fact, they ask a concern that puts the interlocutor within an unfavorable light. Listed here is a fragment associated with the discussion: «Have you learned about the greenhouse impact?» — «Yes.» — «Did you know its reason that is main? — «Yes, the exhaust gases of cars.» — » And just how do you realy then conscience enables you to drive a car or truck?»

The reinforcement question repeats the interlocutor’s statements in a far more rigid, categorical kind. The objective of such a concern would be to force the interlocutor to refute the aforesaid and thus provide him as someone who doesn’t have an opinion that is firm. If the interlocutor states he would not say anything, the journalist will give another, already proper quote using the words: «And you would not say that either?»

Nevertheless the way that is strongest getting the interlocutor out of himself is always to provoke a concern about the cause of the interlocutor’s mental state, as an example: «Why are you therefore nervous?»; «Why are you so annoyed?» An explosion of emotion may follow after such a question. It’s possible that the interview shall end there as well as the journalist should be thrown out of the door. However the journalist will reach their objective — to provoke a scandal.